Skip to main content

Unlike Wine, Tape Does Not Improve With Age

Tapes do not improve with age. Quite the opposite. Corporates, consumer and heritage clients have vast archives of magnetic tape that contain information that needs to be preserved. 


70% of all audio-visual material is under the threat of deterioration, damage or obsolescence. From about 1950 through the 1990s, most of the world’s audio-visual was entrusted to analogue magnetic recording tape for archival storage. 

Now that analogue magnetic tape has moved into a niche archival market, that we at Oxford Duplication Centre specialise in, it is time to reflect and realise that it is time to start worrying about the remaining lifetime of existing tapes. 


 Video tapes are fundamentally composed of three layers: 

 1. the binder layer – magnetic particles responsible for signal quality 
 2. the substrate – stability, strength and friction support 
 3. the backing – stability, strength and friction support 


Corporate and consumer tapes all share one thing in common: they are magnetic media. There are many ways tape can deteriorate: 


 • Magnetic particles gradually lose their charge, in a process called remanence decay resulting in some colour shift toward weaker hues and loss of detail. 

 • Magnetic particles may accidentally demagnetise. This can be from storing too near a magnetic source or even from the playback machine itself. 

 • The lubricant in the binder layer is used up. With each playback it erodes, the binder layer itself takes on more wear, which can directly cause information loss.  

• The binder layer can become a sticky and unplayable. The binder’s polymers will absorb water eventually delaminate. Typically called sticky-shed syndrome. Playing a tape in this condition will damage both tape and the playback machine. 

 • The backing and substrate can become stretched. Multiple rewinding’s and playback. This causes tracking errors that can dramatically reduce playback quality. 


Conclusion 

If the content is important and should not be lost, copy it now. Do not rely on old tape. Unlike wine, tape does not improve with age. Developing a logical plan and sticking with it is an important part of preserving the audio-visual assets in your collection. It is important to consider that equipment and related knowledge about how to play older tapes will not survive much longer. 


Fortunately, at Oxford Duplication Centre we hold some of the rarest tape machines which are serviced and maintained by our experienced team. 

Kind regards 
Cheryl 
Director 

Oxford Duplication Centre 
Corporate, Consumer and Heritage Digitisation 
29 Banbury Road Kidlington Oxfordshire OX5 1AQ 

Tel: 01865 457000 
Current opening hours: Monday to Friday 10-3pm by appointment only 

cheryl@oxfordduplicationcentre.com 
www.oxfordduplicationcentre.com 





ADDITIONAL TAGS: #ARCHIVE DUPLICATION #ARCHIVING #AUDIOVISUAL #BROADCAST TAPES #CONVERTING #DIGITISATION #DUPLICATION #FAMILYTAPES #HERITAGE DUPLICATION #TAPES TO PRO-RES #VIDEOTAPES 

Oxford Duplication Centre Corporate, Heritage and Consumer Digitisation Services within Audio Video Film Image and Text. Oxford duplication Centre

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How Magnetic's Can Destroy Your Family VHS Tape Memories

MAGNETIC DAMAGE TO FAMILY VIDEO TAPES Magnetic tape damage is pretty common. Family tapes store video and audio information in the form of a magnetic strip. The VCR has special heads that can pick up on these magnetic signals and translate them into images and sound that plays on your TV. While magnets are used to write information to the tape, they are also used to erase footage from your tape. Since VHS uses an iron oxide as its formula, this makes them very susceptible to magnetic damage. A tape that has been exposed to magnetic damage is nearly always irreparable. There is no way to recover footage that has been magnetically erased or damaged. The best bet is to make sure you keep your video tapes away from anything resembling a magnet! CLIENT CASE Unfortunately one of our clients contacted us Friday with regard to his family Hi8 video tapes that had been damaged by the magnetic field given off by a mobile phone. He asked whether our company would be able to help recover

How to Digitise Glass Plate Negatives | Oxford Archiving

The Preservation of The Curnock Glass Plate Negatives Introduction Our services ( @OxfordDuplicat1 )  are highly recommended in the UK for specialist photographic film scanning. Trusted to our company, we are preparing The Curnock glass plate collection, held at Oxford Brookes University and part of the  @MethodistGB collection. Almost all archives possess some type of photographic collection. Many individuals typically think of “photographs” as plastic-based negatives and slides; but these photographic techniques are relatively recent inventions. Prior to the invention of cellulose nitrate film in 1903, photographic emulsions were made on glass supports. These glass supports are typically referred to as glass plate negatives. The term “glass plate negative” refers to two separate formats: the collodion wet plate negative and the gelatin dry plate. Both of these formats consist of a light sensitive emulsion that is fixed to the glass plate base with a binder. Dozens of photographic te

What is Betacam SP? Is it Still in Use?

Sony’s Betamax lost out to JVC’s VHS in the home video entertainment format war in the 1980s.   This didn’t stop Sony from venturing into another ‘Beta’ format, namely, Betacam SP or Beta SP. SP stands for Superior Quality.   Sony introduced this analogue video camera format in 1986.  Before Betacam SP was Betacam which was released in 1982 as the ‘pro version’ of Betamax.   Betacam SP is an enhancement of the Betacam format. The Betacam system was a 1/2-inch tape format (similar to VHS and Betamax) that needed a camcorder, video recorder, and tape. It was targeted at the professional market.    It was meant to be an improvement on Sony’s 3/4-inch U-Matic tape format.   Betacam tapes came in two sizes – Short (S) and Long (L).   Betacam camcorders for consumers could only load the S version.   Only broadcast stations with a complete Beta system could support both the S and L versions through recorders meant for editing.   Betacam offered a horizontal resolution of three hundred lines