Skip to main content

Comparision between 10-bit Uncompressed and FFV1 Video Archive Preservation at Oxford Duplication Centre

DISCUSSING FFV1

The most common challenge in digitising moving image is the file sizes that result from the actual digitisation.  The file sizes can be huge and with that comes the increased cost of storage and maintenance for long term preservation.


Common consensus consider 10-bit uncompressed to be the preservation standard for moving image because it uses no file compression. 

It is considered the most reliable safest format for moving image preservation at the current time. 10-bit uncompressed deliver high image resolution, colour quality and sharpness whilst avoiding motion compensation and compression artefacts.




THE DOWNSIDE TO 10-BIT UNCOMPRESSED

1 hour of 10-bit uncompressed video can produce a 100gb file. To put it into perspective it would take 21 DVDs to store a video of this size.  As you can see, its a lot of data!

WHAT IS FFV1?

FFV1 is a video codec developed within FFmpeg. It is lossless, meaning that it compresses video without introducing quantization degradations. Therefore, FFV1 is a good choice for archiving and preservation. A lossless codec comparison found FFV1 to be the "most balanced", offering "relatively good speed and high compression". There are two versions of the codec supported by ffmpeg, version 1 and 3.

COMPARISON

FFV1 is a lossless codec which can store its own aspect ratio data which has started to gain in popularity as an alternative to 10-bit uncompressed.  FFV1 uses lossless compression (think of a zip drive) to store digitised moving image at reduced file sizes without any data loss.  

FFV1 is part of the  open-source FFmpeg project which has been around since 2003.  FFV1 uses entropy encoding to deliver mathematically lossless intra-frame compression.  As a result this produces substantially smaller file sizes when compared to 10-bit uncompressed digitisation.

TESTING ENCODED FILES

The testing shows that files encoded to FFV1 produces files around 1/3rd smaller than 10-bit uncompressed.  Both formats can be carried in a variety of different wrappers (container files) such as AVI (Microsoft), MOV (Apple) or MKV (open source).

The encoded video and audio streams are wrapped together in the container with other data streams that include technical metadata.  The type and variety of data that a container can hold are specific to that container format.

EXCITING TIMES BUT SOME DOWNSIDES!

Reduced files produced using FFV1 are exciting but there are some downsides.  FFV1 is open source and as such will not play on  video software on MAC and Windows, nor can FFV1 be utilised within commercially available digitisation hardware and software. It can only be converted using 'terminal command'.  This is because currently Apple, Microsoft, Adobe and Black-magic has not adopted the codec or announced plans to do so.

Any file format that does not eventually achieve widespread adoption and universal playback within the broadcasting and film-making communities has a higher risk of long term obsolescence and lack of engineering support.  

I should also mention that FFV1 version 3 is nearing release. It is now available in ffmpeg under experimental status as testing completes. The version 3 adds multithreaded encoding, which should speed up encoding by about 2.5 times. For long term digital preservation FFV1 version 3 also incorporates mandated checksums per frame. Thus if any digital damage occurs to the file in storage or transmission, an ffv1 decoder should be able to identify which frames were affected, which makes the preservationist's response much more specific than if only enabled with a whole file checksum.

Generally I'd recommend that an uncompressed codec may be the safer choice for an archive with limited digital preservation infrastructure since the technology dependencies, consequences of digital damage, and requirements for access may be less severe than with lossless codecs.


container
video-codec
audio-codec
1.
MXF
JPEG2000
PCM (uncompressed)
2.
MXF
Uncompressed
PCM (uncompressed)
3.
MOV
ProRes
PCM (uncompressed)
4.
MKV
FFV1
PCM (uncompressed)
5.
AVI
FFV1
PCM (uncompressed)



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

History of Real Tennis - The Royal Game

History of Real Tennis “To see Good Tennis! What divine joy Can fill our leisure, or our minds employ? Let other people play at other things; The King of Games is still the Game of Kings” from Parker’s Piece by J.K. Stephen Recently we were requested to digitise photographs for a client who's son had refurbished a Victorian Real Tennis Court.  What followed was a fascinating history of Real Tennis. Real Tennis is still almost the same sport as the Royal Game that was played with such great enthusiasm at all the princely courts of Europe and by a large contingent of the urban elite between roughly 1500-1800.  After 1800 the interest in the game dwindled on the continent, but it survived in Great Britain. After 1874, when the new game of lawn tennis swept the country, royal tennis became more fashionable again among the English aristocracy.  By the year 1900 the popularity of lawn tennis was so great that it was universally called "tennis" and the old game ha...

Corporate and Heritage 9.5mm, 8mm, 16mm and 35mm Cine and Motion Film Scanning Solutions | Oxford UK

Corporate and Heritage 9.5mm, 8mm, 16mm and 35mm Cine and Motion Film Scanning Solutions | Oxford UK We offer many output options from Native, Pro-Res, MOV, Blu-Ray and DVD for all cine and motion film, optical sound, magnetic sound.  Our services are highly valued for the quality and preservation of precious media.  Nitrate Film Please contact cheryl@oxfordduplicationcentre.com or call our office: 01865 457000 35mm motion film silent (1893 – 1960) Services 35mm motion film optical sound(1923 – ) Services 35mm magnetic tape (1923 – ) Services 16mm film silent (1923 – ) Services 16mm film optical sound (1923 – ) Services 16mm film magnetic sound (1923 – ) Services Standard 8 cine film (1932 – ) Services Super 8 cine film (1965 – ) Services 9.5mm pathe film (1922 – 1960) Services Time Reg. 8mm Cine Sup. 8mm Cine 16mm Cine 35mm Motion Film 10 sec. 3 feet 3 1/3 feet 6 feet 15 feet 30 sec. 9 feet 10 feet 18 feet 45 feet 1 min. 18 feet 20 feet 36 feet 90 feet 3 min. 54 feet 60 feet ...

Photograph Archiving for Oxford United Football Club

Scanning Archival Photographic Images - Community Heritage Projects Our archive department has been busy working on Oxford United Football Club's archive of photographs.   Before we scan the photos, it is important to consider the way in which the files will be organised. Either by date, event, image size and how the files will be names.    Handling and Cleaning Photographs Our archive suite ensures to carefully handle the photographic historical items by their edges to avoid damage from fingerprints.  Fingerprints are a significant threat to photographic materials and can be very difficult to correct. Fingerprints may not manifest in photographic materials until long after the actual incident of touching the surface.  Air blowers are used to remove dust and a lint-free wipe or cloth to clean the scanning bed before scanning. Our archive technicians wear cotton or latex gloves when handling historical items.  Dust on historical items and scanning beds ...